Presentation Rubric
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presentor seems univolved. Indifferent. Work is flat, stiff. All tell, no show. Anyone could have done it. |
Personality, flavor, style of presentor shows sometimes. Pleasant, acceptable,earnest, cautious, routine. |
Confident, vital, honest style gives viewer a powerful sense of presentor's convictions. Natural language amuses, provokes, delights. |
|
|
Takes an unreflective and routine approach to the subject. Little evidence of gaining new understandings. |
Takes a successful but ordinary approach to the subject. Remains at knowledge level thinking. |
Unique, insightful, or fresh approach. Analyzes, synthesizes, evaluates and applies new knowledge. |
|
|
Central idea is undeveloped. Strays from topic. Hard to follow. Lacks details and examples. |
Central idea with support is obvious. Stays on topic. Predictable. |
Central idea is focused, clear, and specific. Fresh and original insights. Details keep viewers attention. |
|
|
Order is confusing. Ideas, details, and events not shaped yet. The beginning and end are vague and undefined. |
Order of presentation makes sense. Beginning, middle, and end are obvious. Most details are in the right place. |
Clear direction moves audience through the presentation. Beginning gains attention. Details fit and build to main point. End provokes thought. |